Check Back Daily For New Classified Ads!
 When You Call, Tell Them You Found Their Classified Ad On-Line At The Political Observer!
~
Read Previous Issues of The Political Observer Print Edition At:
www.cdnc.ucr.edu/cdnc
Select: "Titles"
 Now Updated Through The October 2012 Issue

Knight v. Runner ~ 2012 Legislative Year in Review: page 6.
~
 January's Social & Political Commentary by Amy Jingle!: page 3

~
"THE BERLIN WALL"  by Verena Hawkins, Contributing Writer: page 6
~
Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson, and the $2 Federal Reserve Note: page 2.

Page 6

 

 THE BERLIN WALL
    --------------------------------------------

  Verena Hawkins
  Contributing Writer
  Based in Ansbach, Germany

   There have been many drastic events in the history of mankind, but none as horrific as World War II.

   Millions were killed worldwide and many suffered terrible injuries. Families were torn apart and experienced devastating losses.

   When the war was finally over it was a relief for everyone; except for the Germans. They had to experience the consequences of this destructive war they had started for 44 years.

   Following World War II everyone was hoping for times to become better. Many Germans did not expect 16 years after the country finally surrendered they would experience hard setbacks.

   When the citizens of East Berlin woke up August 13, 1961, they realized the unimaginable had finally happened; borders between the Soviet-district to the rest of the Berlin had closed.

   Millions of people were stuck, and not just for a little while, but for 28 years.

   Children grew up without experiencing the Freedom of Western Civilization, and senior citizens passed away without being able to see the country they had known one last time.

   After the war had ended, Germany was split into four sectors; American, Soviet, English, and French.

   What did not appear to be a problem soon proved to become a nightmare for citizens in the Soviet-sector.

   Berlin, like the rest of Germany, was also split into these four sectors, but Berliners were the most drastically affected by this division.

   What many people living in the Soviet areas, The German Democratic Republic (GDR), soon realized was that life in any other sector was significantly better.

   Between the years of 1949 and 1961 around 2.7 million people left the GDR. 

   This high decrease of the population caused increasing difficulties for the East German communist party, the SED.

   In the final year before the wall was built a total of 200,000 people made a permanent move to the West.

   Between the years 1954 -1960, East Germany suffered a "brain drain."

   During that period, 4,600 doctors, 15,885 teachers, 738 university teachers, 15,536 engineers and technicians moved from East to West Germany.

   The large amount of people moving meant businesses were having trouble to keep up their pace and hospitals were running out of doctors; overall, the entire economic situation of the GDR was at stake.

   These aspects would imply the wall was built to secure the economic system of East Germany, especially because many of the people that fled were highly qualified workers.

   The reasoning the GDR Council of Ministers actually gave their citizens was, in order to put a stop to the hostile activity of West Germany’s and West Berlin’s revanchist and military forces, border controls were set up.

   But in fact, neither West Germany nor West Berlin was causing any harm to East Germany.

   The assumption arises; this was a lie to cover up the despair the GDR government was feeling, when they began to lose such a large amount of work force.

   On the 13th of August 1961, the Council, under the Secretary General Erich Honecker, and with the approval of the Soviet Union, had borders blocked off to the rest of Berlin.

   When people woke up that morning, they were completely barred into their district.

   It is hard to imagine what a great impact it must have had on the citizens trapped in East Berlin.

   Frustrated citizens had to watch as streets were torn up and barricades of paving stones erected.

   The subway and local railway services between East and West Berlin were interrupted.

   The whole process happened so quickly that the overnight blockades caused the separation of families living on different sides of the streets.

   If you had unluckily parked your car on the west side of the street, then it was gone.

   Nobody was given a chance to cross the border just one last time.

   Some parts of the border were the backside of East German’s houses, so many desperately tried last minute escapes through their back windows, some even jumped out of dangerous heights to save themselves.

   There had been thousands of people from East and West Berlin commuting to the other side to work, of which all suddenly faced unemployment.

   Some, who had been working the night shift, could not even return home.

   The extreme communist government in East Berlin found a way to employ people.

   They developed a secret agency, Stasi, whose main task was to find enemies of the government.

   Soon, they had recruited one out of six citizens.

   On the 22nd of August, the Ministry of the Interior finally established crossing points in Berlin.

   There were seven on Berlin streets and one at a train station, but citizens of East Berlin and the GDR were prohibited to pass these crossing points.

   Visitors from West Germany, diplomats and members of the military were the only people allowed to cross, and of course only at so called checkpoints.

   Naturally, these changes made by the communists provoked reactions by international politicians.

   Outrage from the international community erupted at the choice to construct a wall.

   The American secretary of state, Dean Rusk, said that it was a flagrant violation of East-West agreements, and there would be a vigorous protest to Russia.

   A Foreign Office spokesman in London said that the restrictions violate the Four-Power status of Berlin, and are therefore illegal.

   Unfortunately, the reactions of Allied troops were moderate because their policy regarding Berlin was not directly affected.

    The only time America actually took action was when Western Allies were forced to show identification as they entered the Soviet sector.

   In the American view the Allied right to move freely throughout Berlin had been violated.

   American and Soviet tanks faced off at each other at Checkpoint Charlie for 16 hours.

   Many East Berliners and East Germans continued to dream of Freedom in the West.

   Some citizen’s urge to leave the East was so strong that they risked their lives trying to escape.

   It was not as easy as many hoped, the wall and surrounding area was controlled by guards.

   There were 302 watchtowers and 20 bunkers that were built along the 155km long boarder.

   The guards were given the order to shoot at escapees.

   The 15 feet wall was also placed with machine gun emplacements and mines.  This made it even more difficult to escape.

   Although it was considered nearly impossible to escape, many still tried.

   The escape methods ranged from digging a tunnel underground, hot air balloon, to escape committees that helped East Germans escape for a high cost.

   Some escapes were successful, but many were not. Thousands were captured during their attempt and 191 were killed.

   On August 23, 1962, 18-year-old Peter Fechter bled to death after he was shot down by East Berlin border patrol in his attempt to escape.

   The last to become a victim of the wall, was Chris Gueffroy on June 2, 1989. 

  
Even though many were devastated by the restrictions on their Freedom, it was not until 1989 that they really began to protest.

   The East was too shocked about the wall, and too shocked about the actions taken by the Soviet towards anyone who disobeyed their restrictions.

   People were too numb to take action, and as years passed they accepted it.

   The change came when in the early autumn of 1989, a central Leipzig church, the Nikolaikirche, hosted prayer meetings for Democracy and Justice every Monday.

   These Monday demonstrations took place over three months and were attended by political dissidents, would-be emigrants and ordinary East Germans caught up in the growing wave of defiance.

   On October 9th, 70,000 East Germans openly protested against the communist regime, demanding Freedom and Democracy.

   Several days before this protest, people in Dresden and Plauen had gathered to show their discontent at the 40th anniversary party of the Communist State.

   This attitude quickly spread nationwide. The demonstrations were very dangerous, especially because the authorities had threatened to use force to break up protests – but they never did.

   It was probably because of the large number of demonstrators.

   Authorities had anticipated only 30,000, rather than 70,000 demonstrators that showed-up.

   Not just mass demonstrations caused the wall to fall; there were several other factors involved.

   Several European countries began to democratize and ease their borders. Many East Germans took this chance to flee to other countries.

   After these developments in Europe and demonstrations in Germany, the SED held a party congress about how to gain back control.

   On November 9th, Günter Schabowsky, a Politburo member, was asked at a press conference whether there would be any changes to the East German travel restriction.

    Not expecting this question, he said that as far as he knew all travel restrictions would be lifted immediately.

   Thousands of Berliners watching live, rushed to the borders and to the wall; confused and overwhelmed guards stood back and let people pass.

   November 9th was the beginning of the end.

   Once the borders were opened and Germany reunited, many people from the East had to adapt to major changes.

   East Germans had lived under a radical communist party for nearly thirty years and changing to Democracy meant coping with many transformations: politically, economically, psychologically, socially and culturally.

   More than 60% of industrial workers became unemployed. About 40% of the population was concerned about impending unemployment.

   Due to the fact that West Germans were taking over leadership positions, they brought to the East a new style of living, acting, dressing and even changes in the German languages.

   This reorganization of the political and social structure also meant insecurities in housing, as well as personal identity.

   After the wall fell, many people from East Germany suffered from so called ‘minor disorders’ such as depression, anxiety and somatization.

   Many had trouble adjusting to the new changes, especially since they occurred within a very short time frame.

   For everyone, the Second World War was traumatizing, but for East Germany it did not change once it ended.

   With the relief of the ending war and the happiness of having survived it, came the devastation of the reality living in the strict Communist east.

   Once the nightmare was finally over, the changes came so suddenly that there are still people wishing it had never happened.

   For outsiders, it is unimaginable what people had to go through.

   Twenty three years later, the after-taste is still noticeable in East Germany.

   The irony of everything regarding the wall is
that the Communist power managed to suppress its citizens for 28 years, but the careless comment of one GDR politician collapsed the State within a day.

   Note: Interested persons can refer to the German websites:  “The Berlin Wall.”
www.english-online.at/places/berlin-wall/berlin-wall.htm  

  
“The Construction of the Berlin Wall.”
www.berlin.de/mauer/geschichte/index.en.html  

“Why the Wall Was Build.” Berlinermauer
www.berlinermauer.se/BerlinWall/bygg.htm

   Verena Mendler Hawkins was born, raised and attended school in Bavaria, Germany. With family she lived in Sheffield, England, for three years attending a British high school. She completed a three year optician apprenticeship and now is pursuing a degree from the University of Maryland European College in Germany. She is married to an American and plans to move to the U.S. upon completion of her degree work.

Knight vs. Runner
~

2012 Legislative Session in Review
-------------------------------

LANCASTER - As has become a year-end tradition with The Political Observer since 2005 when the Antelope Valley’s two representatives in Sacramento happened to be married to one another – George Runner in the Senate and Sharon Runner in the Assembly – it is once again time to publish our annual review of the voting records for the Antelope Valley’s (AV) two representatives on all Bills reaching the governor’s desk for the 2012 legislative session.

 

   Although both seated on the Republican side of the aisle – Sharon Runner in the Senate and Steve Knight in the Assembly – it may be worth noting for constituents that the two legislators do not always support similar politics.

 

    In the 2012 legislative session, 996 Bills were passed by the legislature – 876 signed and 120 vetoed by Governor Brown. Of the 996 Bills, Runner missed 658 votes – 66% – due to illness.  On the 338 Bills both Runner and Knight cast a recorded vote, The Political Observer discovered 28 instances (8%) where they cast votes opposite one another.

 

   Below is the roster of legislation reaching the governor’s desk where the two High Desert legislators voted in opposition. Readers will find the Bill number, the sponsor of the legislation along with their party affiliation and city, the title of the Bill, followed by the vote, first in the Assembly then in the Senate. Then Knight’s vote, then Runner’s, followed by the action taken by the governor.

 

   Following select Bills is the analysis as written by either the Senate or Assembly. Read Bill text at: www.leginfo.ca.gov/bilinfo

                                        Assembly Bills                                              Vote                   Knight Runner Brown

 

 

AB 345 Torres (D-Pomona) – Redevelopment.                                    78-0 & 28-4                   Yes No Veto

Requires redevelopment agencies (RDAs) to post a copy of their annual report on the agency's or the community's Internet Web site.

 

AB 401 Ammiano (D-San Francisco) – School safety: Carl Washington School Safety and Violence Prevention Act.
                                                                                                          58-20 & 36-2                  No Yes Sign

 

AB 432 Dickinson (D-Sacramento) – Transit: Sacramento County.       60-17 & 38-0                   No Yes Sign

 

AB 929 Wieckowski (D-Fremont) – Debtor exemptions: bankruptcy.   53-23 & 36-0                    No Yes Sign


Increases the amounts of property exemptions for motor vehicles, jewelry, and tools of the trade that a bankruptcy debtor may elect to exempt such property from enforcement of a money judgment.


Specifically: 1) Increases the amounts of the following property exemptions under CCP Section 703.140: a) The exemption for the debtor's interest in a motor vehicle or vehicles is set at an amount not to exceed $4,800 for one or more vehicles (an increase from $2,775 for a single vehicle); b) The exemption for the debtor's aggregate interest in jewelry, held primarily for personal, family, or household use of the debtor, is set at an amount not to exceed $1,425 (an increase from $1,150); and, c) The exemption for the debtor's aggregate interest in any implements, professional books, or tools of the trade of the debtor or the trade of a dependent of the debtor, is set at an amount not to exceed $7,175 (an increase from $1,750). d) The exemption for the debtor's aggregate interest in real property or personal property used by a debtor or his dependent as a residence, or in a cooperative that owns property that the debtor or dependent uses as a residence, is set at an amount not to exceed $24,060 (an increase from $17,425).


2) Increases the income eligibility threshold for a judgment debtor or spouse aged 55 years or older to claim the $175,000 homestead exemption.

 

AB 976 Hall III (D-Los Angeles) – Public contracts: consulting services: community choice aggregators.
                                                                                                           64-9 & 27-9                     No Yes Veto


Prohibits consultants advising Community Choice Aggregators (CCA) from bidding on CCA contracts.  Specifically prohibits a CCA from purchasing electricity or energy services from an entity that provided analysis, advice, consulting, or other services to CCA prior to CCA notifying that CCA service will commence.

 

AB 1301 Hill (D-South San Francisco) – Retail tobacco sales: STAKE Act.      60-18 & 32-5         No Yes Sign


Repeals and recasts the Board of Equalization's (BOE) existing penalty structure for violations of the Stop Tobacco Access to Kids Enforcement (STAKE) Act, a statewide enforcement program related to the illegal sales of tobacco products to persons under the age of 18.


1) Require the Department of Public Health (DPH) to notify BOE of the third, fourth, or fifth violations it assesses against a person, firm or corporation that furnishes tobacco products or instruments to minors within 60 days of an uncontested violation or payment of the civil penalty for an uncontested violation.  Requires DPH to provide BOE with unspecified information about the entity receiving the violation.


2) Repeal BOE's existing penalty structure for the STAKE Act and Penal Code Section 308 and instead requires BOE to levy an additional $250 civil penalty on an entity receiving a violation from DPH to be deposited into a specified fund.


3) Delete the Assembly's revised schedule for BOE action in response to a violation of the STAKE Act, and instead requires BOE to suspend or revoke the entity's license in the following manner:

a) A 45-day suspension for a third violation at the same location within five years,

b) A 90-day suspension for a fourth violation at the same location within five years, and,

c) Revocation of the license for a fifth violation at the same location within five years.


4) Repeals existing law that allows a licensee to appeal a BOE decision to suspend or revoke a license in writing within 30 days after the notice of the suspension or revocation.


5)Requires BOE to provide a licensee with at least 10 days written notice of a pending suspension or revocation, except where specified, and an opportunity to appeal the suspension or revocation and the civil penalty, but only for the purpose of correcting a mistake or clerical error.

6) Repeals existing law stipulating that convictions of violations by a retailer at one retail location cannot be accumulated against other locations of that same retailer.


7) Repeals existing law stipulating that convictions of violations accumulated against a prior retail owner at a licensed location cannot be accumulated against a new retail owner at the same location.

 

AB 1432 Mitchell (D-Los Angeles) – Crimes.                                             75-5 & 37-1                No Yes Sign


Requires a parent or guardian of a child under 14 years of age who knows or should have known that the child has died to notify a public safety agency, as defined, within 24 hours of the time that the parent or guardian knew or should have known that the child has died, and to notify law enforcement within 24 hours of the time that a parent or guardian knows or should have known that the child is a missing person and that there is evidence that the child is a person at risk, except as specified. The bill would make a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for not more than one year, or by a fine not exceeding $1,000, or by both that fine and imprisonment. The bill would also provide that these provisions shall not preclude prosecution under any other provision of law.

 

AB 1518 Perea (D-Fresno) – Weighmasters: automated weighing systems.   60-16 & 33-1               No Yes Sign


Authorizes a weighmaster weighing any vehicle moving certain construction materials, to use an unattended weighing system to weigh the vehicle and issue a weighmaster certificate to buyers who opt to utilize the unattended system under specified conditions.

 

AB 1674 Ma (D-San Francisco) – Child custody: visitation.                        59-19 & 23-10              Yes No Sign

 

AB 1680 Wieckowski (D-Fremont) – Dissenting shareholders' rights.          58-18 & 37-0                 No Yes Sign


This bill makes various changes to California's dissenter rights law by establishing that the fair market value of both public and private companies as of the day of, and immediately prior to the first announcement of the terms of the proposed reorganization or short-form merger, and eliminates the provision making holders of publicly traded shares only eligible to receive the fair market value of their dissenting shares if five percent or more of the shares are dissenting shares.

 

AB 1770 Lowenthal (D-Long Beach) – California Transportation Financing Authority. 69-4 & 23-14 Yes No Sign


This bill clarifies that the California Transportation Financing Authority (CTFA) may approve rail projects that are, or include, rolling stock, and provides that a project may be eligible for financing under CTFA if it is owned or operated, rather than owned and operated, by Caltrans or other project sponsor.

 

AB 1700 Butler (D-Marina Del Rey) – Property taxation: change in ownership: exclusion: co-tenancy interests.
                                                                                                               48-23 & 34-1                    No Yes Sign


Excludes from property tax reassessment a transfer of co-tenancy interest in a principal residence if the principal residence was owned by two individuals and was transferred to one of those individuals upon the death of the other, with the survivor obtaining sole ownership of that property.

 

AB 1886 Chesbro (D-Eureka) – Aquaculture.                                           51-26 & 36-0                    No Yes Sign


Increases the regulatory fees for aquaculture facilities and expands the duties of the aquaculture program coordinator position within the Department of Fish and Game. 

 

AB 2040 Swanson (D-Oakland) – Prostitution: human trafficking: expungement.    49-21 & 36-0       No Yes Sign


Provides that a person adjudicated a ward of the court for an offense involving an act of prostitution, may upon reaching 18 years of age, petition the court to have his or her record sealed without requiring the person to show that he or she has not been convicted of a felony or of any misdemeanor involving moral turpitude, or that rehabilitation has been attained to the satisfaction of the court.

 

AB 1955 Block (D-San Diego) – Public postsecondary education: campus law enforcement agency and student liaison.
                                                                                                               76-2 & 25-10                  Yes No Sign


This bill requires the California State University (CSU) Board of Trustees, and requests the University of California (UC) Board of Regents, to designate an individual at each campus to serve as a liaison between campus law enforcement agencies and students exercising rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution and the California Constitution.

 

AB 2180 Alejo (D-Salinas) – Local health care districts: employment contracts.     52-26 & 30-6        No Yes Sign


If a health care district enters into a written employment agreement with a hospital administrator, including a hospital administrator who is designated as a chief executive officer, the written employment agreement shall include all material terms and conditions agreed to between the district and the hospital administrator regarding compensation, deferred compensation, retirement benefits, severance or continuing compensation after termination of the agreement, vacation pay and other paid time off for illness or personal reasons, and other employment benefits that differ from those available to other full-time employees.

 

AB 2201 Bradford (D-Inglewood) – Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981: civil penalties.
                                                                                                                         57-17 & 38-0          No Yes Sign


This bill increases the civil penalties associated with violations of the Elder California Pipeline Safety Act of 1981 from $10,000 per day of violation to $200,000 and from $500,000 to $2 million for any related series of violations.

 

AB 2279 Swanson (D-Oakland) – School districts: emergency apportionments: trustees. 79-1 & 24-12  Yes No Sign


Authorizes the State Superintendent of Public Instruction to remove a state-appointed trustee from a school district that received an emergency loan after three years, provided the district has adequate fiscal systems in place and the Superintendent determines the district's future compliance with its fiscal plan is probable.

 

AB 2284 Chesbro (D-Eureka) – Irrigation.                                                        54-23 & 38-0               No Yes Sign


Imposes an additional civil penalty for cultivating marijuana within a state park, and allows law enforcement to stop any vehicle transporting agricultural irrigation supplies into a specified area, if agricultural irrigation supplies are in plain view. 

 

AB 2396 Committee on Arts, Entertainment, Sports, Tourism – Employment of infants: entertainment industry.
                                                                                                                       55-20 & 35-0                 No Yes Sign


This bill specifies that prior to obtaining a temporary work permit, the parent or guardian of an infant 15 days to one month old, must obtain the medical certification of a physician as currently required by law, but clarifies that a work permit may not be issued until the doctors permission has been obtained and confirmed.

 

AB 2440 Lowenthal (D-Long Beach) – Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority: contracting.
                                                                                                                     55-20 & 37-0                 No Yes Sign

 

AB 2610 Skinner (D-Berkeley) – Tenants: foreclosure and unlawful detainer.      69-9 & 36-0                  No Yes Sign


Improves notice to tenants in foreclosed properties. Specifically: 1) Revises the requirement of existing law providing 60 days' notice to instead provide, in the case of a month-to-month lease or periodic tenancy, for 90 days' notice for tenants in a foreclosed property.


2) Specifies that a tenant holding possession under a residential lease of a rental housing unit at the time the property is sold in foreclosure shall have the right to possession until the end of the lease term.  This provision would not apply if the new owner will occupy the property as his or her primary residence, the lessee is the borrower or the child, spouse or parent of the borrower, the lease was not the result of an arm's-length transaction or the rent is substantially less than the fair market rent for the property, unless reduced or subsidized by federal, state or local law.  In either case, however, the new owner must give the tenant a 90-day notice to vacate. 


3) Revises existing law's notice that is sent to tenants when a notice of sale is posted on the property to ensure that it accurately reflects the revisions proposed above.  This bill would provide that the changes in this notice would not become operative until March 1, 2013, or 60 days following the issuance of an amended new translation by the Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA), whichever occurs later.


4) Extends the January 1, 2013 sunset date that would otherwise apply to these sections and the related provisions of existing law for six years.

 

Senate Bills

 

SB 419 Simitian (D-Palo Alto) – Solid waste: home-generated sharps.           79-0 & 32-8                Yes No Veto


This bill requires pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide their existing safe home-generated sharps management plans to the Department of Resource Recovery and Recycling DRRR) electronically and requires the manufacture to make them readily accessible on their Web sites.


SB 628 Senator Leland Yee (D-San Francisco) – Acupuncture: regulation.    59-16 & 36-0               No Yes Sign


Codifies an existing regulation promulgated by the Acupuncture Board (Board) related to an acupuncturist's permitted use of the title "Doctor."  Specifically, this bill states that it is unprofessional conduct for an acupuncturist to use the title "Doctor" or "Dr." in the following instances:


1) In connection with the practice of acupuncture unless he or she holds a license authorizing its use, or an earned doctorate degree from an accredited, approved, or authorized educational institution under the California Private Postsecondary Education Act of 2009 in acupuncture, oriental medicine, a biological science, or field otherwise related to the practice of an acupuncturist authorized in the Acupuncture Licensure Act.


2) Without indicating the type of license or degree which authorizes its use.

 

SB 874 Hancock (D-Berkeley) – School districts: community college districts: parcel taxes: exemptions.
                                                                                                                  59-11 & 38-0                No Yes Sign


Allows school districts to exempt persons receiving Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) from qualified special taxes.

 

SB 1001 Yee (D-San Francisco) – Political Reform Act of 1974: lobbyists and committees: fees.
                                                                                                                  60-16 & 32-5                 No Yes Sign


Imposes fees on certain political committees and increases fees on lobbyists, with most of the resulting revenues to be used for the Secretary of State's (SOS's) online disclosure system. Specifically:


1) Requires each committee that qualifies as a committee by virtue of having received contributions totaling $1,000 or more in a calendar year (known as a recipient committee) to pay a fee of $50 per year to the SOS until the committee is terminated.


2) Imposes a penalty of $150 for failure to timely pay the fee in (1).


3) Increases, from $25 to $50, the annual fee each lobbying firm and lobbyist employer pays for each of their registered lobbyists, and makes imposition of this fee mandatory rather than discretionary.


4) Requires the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) to enforce the above requirements.


5) Directs one-half of the monies collected pursuant to (3) to the General Fund and the other half of these revenues, plus the revenues generated through the fee in (1), to the newly established Political Disclosure, Accountability, Transparency, and Access Fund, which is to be used, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for maintenance, repair, and improvement of the SOS's online disclosure (Cal-Access) system.

 

SB 1303 Simitian (D-Palo Alto) – Vehicles: automated traffic enforcement systems.  62-12 & 24-14       Yes No Sign


Amends local government open meeting laws to authorize legal action against a legislative body to determine if certain ongoing or past actions of that body have violated those laws within the last nine months, instead of one year.

 

SB 1292 Liu (D-Pasadena) – School employees: principals: evaluation. Authorizes school districts to assess the performance of school principals and establishes provision to guide that evaluation process.
                                                                                                                             65-12 & 38-0          No Yes Sign


This bill authorizes school districts to evaluate principals annually for the first and second year of employment as a new principal in a district.  Specifically, 1) Authorizes the governing board of a school district to identify who will conduct the evaluation of each principal. Further authorizes the governing board to determine the frequency of evaluations, as specified.


2) Authorizes criteria for effective school principal evaluations to be based upon the California Professional Standards for Educational Leaders (CPSEL), as specified. 


3) Authorizes a school principal evaluation to include specified elements, including, but not limited to, pupil academic growth on multiple measures, effective and comprehensive teacher evaluations, instructional strategies, collaborative professional practices, effective school management, self-assessment, and consistent relationships with schoolsite staff, pupils, and parents. 


4) Authorizes federal No Child Left Behind Act Title I (poor/needy pupils) and Title II (improving teacher and principal quality) funds and any other state and federal funds to be used to implement this measure.

 

SB 1549 Vargas (D-San Diego) – Transportation projects: alternative project delivery methods.
                                                                                                                               45-24 & 38-0         No Yes Sign

Website Builder